RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 94.Affirmative Defenses

Last verified June 28, 2026

In one sentenceRule 94 requires a party to plead affirmatively the listed defenses — among them limitations, res judicata, estoppel, fraud, release, and payment — plus any other matter of avoidance, and it sets a special rule for insurance-policy exceptions.

Full Text of Rule 94

Text size

In pleading to a preceding pleading, a party shall set forth affirmatively accord and satisfaction, arbitration and award, assumption of risk, contributory negligence, discharge in bankruptcy, duress, estoppel, failure of consideration, fraud, illegality, injury by fellow servant, laches, license, payment, release, res judicata, statute of frauds, statute of limitations, waiver, and any other matter constituting an avoidance or affirmative defense. Where the suit is on an insurance contract which insures against certain general hazards, but contains other provisions limiting such general liability, the party suing on such contract shall never be required to allege that the loss was not due to a risk or cause coming within any of the exceptions specified in the contract, nor shall the insurer be allowed to raise such issue unless it shall specifically allege that the loss was due to a risk or cause coming within a particular exception to the general liability; provided that nothing herein shall be construed to change the burden of proof on such issue as it now exists.
End

Plain-English Summary

Rule 94 makes certain defenses “use it or lose it.” In responding to a pleading, a party must set forth affirmatively any defense of avoidance or affirmative defense — the rule names a long list, including accord and satisfaction, assumption of risk, contributory negligence, discharge in bankruptcy, duress, estoppel, failure of consideration, fraud, illegality, laches, license, payment, release, res judicata, statute of frauds, statute of limitations, and waiver. A defense not pleaded is generally waived.

The rule adds a special provision for insurance. When a suit is on a policy that insures against general hazards but limits that liability by exceptions, the insured need not plead that the loss falls outside an exception; the insurer must specifically allege that the loss came within a particular exception to raise the issue. The burden of proof is left as it stands.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are affirmative defenses under Texas Rule 94?

Defenses that must be pleaded affirmatively, including statute of limitations, res judicata, estoppel, fraud, release, payment, waiver, and any other matter of avoidance. A defense not pleaded is generally waived.

Who pleads a policy exception in an insurance case?

Under Rule 94, the insurer. The insured need not negate the exceptions; the insurer must specifically allege that the loss came within a particular exception to raise the issue.

Source & verification. Rule text and the official Notes and Comments are reproduced verbatim from the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure (Tex. R. Civ. P. 94), published by the Texas Judicial Branch (txcourts.gov). Promulgated by the Supreme Court of Texas. The plain-English summary is original and draws on official sources. Last verified June 28, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: affirmative defensesstatute of limitationsres judicataavoidanceTRCP 94