Rule 53A.Special masters for parenting disputes in domestic relations actions
Part VI: Trials · Last amended May 1, 2025 · Last verified July 13, 2026
Full Text of Rule 53A
Amendment History
Added effective May 1, 2025.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 53A creates a narrower kind of master built for the day-to-day disputes that come up after a divorce or other domestic relations case — things like parent-time, co-parenting logistics, and child-related expenses. Unlike the general master in Rule 53, a court can appoint a special master under this rule only if both parties stipulate to it, and only after a parenting plan, temporary order, or final order is already in place. If the parties agree to a special master, the court gets to pick who it is.
The appointment order sets the special master's pay, term, and scope, and the court can adjust any of that later for good cause — on its own motion, a party's motion, or the special master's own request. Within that scope, the special master can resolve disputes by issuing written "directives," which take effect as court orders as soon as they're made, unless the special master, the court, or the parties' own written stipulation changes or cancels them. A special master can only impose sanctions if the appointment order specifically authorizes it, and can never hold anyone in contempt. The special master also can't override an existing order or judgment, and any authority to deviate from the parenting plan has to be spelled out expressly and kept narrow — decisions that would otherwise need a judge's signature stay off-limits.
Every directive has to go to the parties in writing and get filed with the court. A parent who disagrees with a directive has 14 days to file a written motion to modify or set it aside (later motions are possible for good cause), spelling out exactly which directive is being challenged, what relief is wanted, and why — with any supporting evidence submitted by declaration. If a domestic commissioner is handling the case, the motion follows Rule 101's procedures; otherwise it follows Rule 7. The court then reviews the directive from scratch, with no deference to the special master, and can send the matter back for more evidence if needed.
The special master's appointment can end several ways: the special master can resign by written notice (but not while an issue is pending), the parties can jointly stipulate to end it, or the court can suspend or terminate it on its own initiative or a party's motion for good cause. Neither parent can end it alone by withdrawing consent. And using this rule for parenting disputes doesn't stop a court from separately appointing a Rule 53 master for other issues in the same case.
Frequently Asked Questions
What's the difference between a Rule 53A special master and a regular Rule 53 master?
A Rule 53A special master is built for one purpose — resolving parenting disputes after a divorce or similar case, like parent-time and child-related expenses — and requires both parents to agree to the appointment. A general Rule 53 master can handle a broader range of issues and doesn't always require the parties' consent.
Can a Utah court appoint a special master without both parents agreeing?
No. The rule requires the parties to stipulate to the appointment before the court can name a special master, and if they do, the court chooses who fills the role.
What is a 'directive' and does it take effect right away?
A directive is the special master's written decision resolving a parenting dispute. It's effective as a court order as soon as it's made, unless the special master, the court, or the parties' written agreement later changes or cancels it.
How do I challenge a special master's directive I disagree with?
File a written motion to modify or set it aside within 14 days of the directive, stating specifically what you're challenging, what you want instead, and why, backed by a declaration for any supporting evidence. The court then reviews the directive with no deference to the special master's decision.
Can a special master hold a parent in contempt for not following a directive?
No. A special master can impose sanctions only if the court's appointment order specifically allows it, and can never make a finding of contempt — that stays with the judge.
Can one parent end the special master's appointment without the other's agreement?
No. Neither parent can unilaterally terminate or change the appointment by withdrawing consent. Ending it requires the special master's own resignation, the parties' joint stipulation, or a court order.