Rule 7A.Motion to enforce order and for sanctions
Part III: Pleadings, Motions, and Orders · Last amended November 1, 2024 · Last verified July 13, 2026
Full Text of Rule 7A
Amendment History
Added effective May 1, 2021; amended effective May 1, 2023; amended effective November 1, 2024.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 7A exists for a narrow situation: a court has already entered an order, and someone isn't following it. Rather than route that dispute through Rule 7's ordinary motion timeline, Rule 7A gives it its own track, faster in some ways, more front-loaded in others. The party seeking enforcement files an ex parte motion to enforce order and for sanctions, in the same case where the original order was entered, and this rule's deadlines — not Rule 7's — control from that point on.
Because the motion asks a court to find that someone violated an order, it needs real evidentiary backing up front. The motion itself must be verified, or supported by an affidavit or declaration based on personal knowledge, and it has to lay out facts that would be admissible in evidence and that would support a finding of violation. It must also come with a proposed order directing the other party to appear and explain themselves. If the moving party wants a contempt finding, the proposed order has to spell out the potential penalties — a fine up to $1,000 and up to 30 days in jail — so nobody is caught off guard.
Once the court signs that order to attend a hearing, the moving party has to serve the order, the motion, and all supporting documents at least 28 days before the hearing date. The court can shorten that window only if the motion asks for an earlier date and specific verified facts show that waiting would cause immediate, irreparable harm. A written opposition isn't required, but if one is filed, it's due within 14 days of service, and a reply follows seven days after that. At the hearing itself, the burden of proving the violation rests on the moving party.
Rule 7A does not reach everywhere. It doesn't apply to proceedings a court starts on its own to enforce an order, to criminal cases, or to sanctions motions under Rule 37(b) for discovery violations. And it doesn't cut back on a court's inherent authority to manage its docket or hold someone in contempt for skipping a hearing. The rule replaces the older "order to show cause" procedure — an order to attend a hearing under Rule 7A now serves the same function.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a motion to enforce order and for sanctions?
It's the procedure a party uses when someone has violated a court order that's already been entered in the case. The moving party files an ex parte motion asking the court to enforce the order and, if requested, to sanction the violator, which can include a contempt finding.
Do I need proof before I file, or can I just allege a violation?
You need proof up front. The motion must be verified or backed by an affidavit or declaration based on personal knowledge, and it has to set out facts that would be admissible in evidence and would support a finding that the order was violated.
What penalties can result from a Rule 7A contempt finding?
If the motion asks the court to hold the other party in contempt, the proposed order must warn that penalties can include a fine of up to $1,000 and confinement in jail for up to 30 days.
How much notice does the other party get before the hearing?
At least 28 days. The moving party must serve the order, the motion, and all supporting documents that far in advance, though the court can shorten the period if the motion requests an earlier date and specific verified facts show immediate, irreparable harm otherwise.
Do I have to file a written response to a Rule 7A motion?
No. A written opposition isn't required. But if you want to file one, it's due within 14 days of service of the order, unless the court sets a different deadline, and it must follow Rule 7's formatting requirements.