§ 8.01-83.Allotment to one or more parties, or sale, in lieu of partition.
Chapter 3. Actions · Article 9. Partition · Last amended 2020 · Last verified July 16, 2026
Full Text of § 8.01-83
Plain-English Summary
This section governs what happens once a party petitions for allotment or a partition sale and the property cannot practicably be divided in kind. Subsection B requires the court to consider allotting the entire property to one or more parties willing to accept it at the value set under § 8.01-81.1, paying the remaining parties their share of that value — even if some of them are under a disability. A purchaser who is also entitled to share in the proceeds gets credit against the price for that share, and the court distributes the proceeds according to each party’s rights, taking care to protect the creditors of any deceased co-tenant.
Before allotting, the court requires the party or parties seeking allotment to notify all other parties that the property may go to anyone willing to accept it, and at what price. When more than one party wants the allotment and a dispute results, subsection B(2) directs the court to weigh the same kind of factors used for partition in kind — collective duration of ownership or possession, sentimental attachment, lawful use and the harm from losing it, contribution to taxes, insurance, and upkeep — with no single factor controlling on its own. Once the court decides who participates, it notifies the parties of what each must pay or will receive and sets a payment deadline at least 60 days out; if a party allotted a share fails to pay by that date, the court orders a sale under § 8.01-83.1, unless it instead lets another party acquire the share within a further reasonable time.
Subsection C covers the middle ground: if allotting the whole property is not practicable or equitable, but the parties’ interests would still be served by selling the whole property or allotting part of it and selling the rest, the court may do either. The price for any part allotted is the court-determined fair market value, unless the parties agree on their own value, and the residue is sold under § 8.01-83.1, with proceeds distributed the same way as under subsection B. Subsection D closes the sequence: if neither allotting the whole nor a part is practicable or equitable, the court orders a sale of the entire property under § 8.01-83.1.
Frequently Asked Questions
What has to happen before a court can allot or sell property in a partition case?
The court must first determine that partition in kind cannot practicably be made. Only then does it move to considering allotment under this section or a sale under § 8.01-83.1.
Can property be allotted to a co-owner who is under a disability?
The statute does not bar that outcome for the owner receiving payment — subsection B allows allotment “notwithstanding that any of those entitled may be a person with a disability,” since that person receives the proceeds their interest entitles them to.
What happens if two or more parties both want the property allotted to them?
The court weighs factors including the duration of ownership or possession, sentimental attachment, lawful use of the property and the harm from losing it, and contribution to taxes, insurance, and upkeep — no single factor decides the outcome on its own.
What happens if a party who wins the allotment doesn’t pay on time?
The court sets a payment deadline of at least 60 days. If the party misses it, the court orders a sale of the entire property under § 8.01-83.1, unless it instead allows another party to acquire the share within a further reasonable time the court sets.
Can the court allot only part of the property and sell the rest?
Yes, under subsection C, when allotting the whole property is not practicable or equitable but allotting part and selling the residue would serve the parties’ interests. The residue sale follows § 8.01-83.1.
Amendment History
Code 1950, § 8-692; 1950, p. 467; 1977, c. 617; 2020, cc. 115, 193.