802.10.Calendar practice.
Ch. 802: Pleadings, Motions and Pretrial Practice · Last amended 2011 · Last verified July 15, 2026
Full Text of Section 802.10
Official Notes
Judicial Council Note, 2010: Sub. (3) has been amended to encourage courts to be more active in managing electronic discovery. Pursuant to Wis. Stat. s. 805.06, the court also may appoint a referee to report on complex or expensive discovery issues, including those involving electronically stored information. [Re Order effective Jan. 1, 2011]
Plain-English Summary
Section 802.10 applies to most civil actions and special proceedings, with a list of exceptions that includes appeals taken to circuit court, certiorari, habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, and quo warranto actions, cases where every defendant is in default, provisional remedies, and several specific chapters. Where it applies, the circuit court may enter a scheduling order, on its own motion or a party’s, after consulting the attorneys and any unrepresented party. That order can set deadlines for joining parties, amending pleadings, filing motions, and completing discovery, fix the time to determine the mode of trial including a jury demand, limit and schedule depositions and discovery including expert disclosures, set dates for conferences and trial, address the timing of summary judgment practice, consider whether to order the parties toward alternative dispute resolution under section 802.12, plan for managing a complex case, and address discovery of electronically stored information, along with any other matter the circumstances call for.
At a pretrial conference, the court can take up formulating and simplifying the issues, eliminating frivolous claims or defenses, securing admissions or stipulations that avoid unnecessary proof, ruling on the admissibility of evidence including limits on expert testimony, identifying witnesses and exhibits, scheduling pretrial briefs, setting further conference and trial dates, and disposing of pending motions.
Each attorney attending a pretrial conference must have authority to enter stipulations and make admissions on matters the participants might reasonably expect to discuss, and the court can require a party or its representative to be present, or reasonably available by phone, to discuss settlement. Violating a scheduling or pretrial order exposes a party to sanctions under the sections cross-referenced in section 802.10(7), including section 802.05.
Frequently Asked Questions
What can a Wisconsin scheduling order cover?
Deadlines for joining parties, amending pleadings, filing motions, completing discovery, deciding the mode of trial, and dates for conferences and trial, among the other matters listed in section 802.10(3).
Does every Wisconsin civil case get a scheduling order?
No. Section 802.10 does not apply to certain categories, including certiorari, habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, and quo warranto actions and several specific chapters, and even where it applies, the court enters an order on its own motion or a party’s motion rather than automatically.
What can happen at a Wisconsin pretrial conference?
The court can narrow the issues, eliminate frivolous claims or defenses, secure stipulations, rule on evidence including expert testimony, identify witnesses and exhibits, and set further conference and trial dates.
Does my attorney need special authority to attend a pretrial conference?
Yes. The attorney must have authority to enter stipulations and make admissions on matters the participants might reasonably anticipate discussing.
What happens if a party violates a Wisconsin scheduling order?
It becomes subject to sanctions under the sections cross-referenced in section 802.10(7), including section 802.05.
Amendment History
History: Sup. Ct. Order, 67 Wis. 2d 585, 634 (1975); 1975 c. 218; Sup. Ct. Order, 82 Wis. 2d ix (1978); 1979 c. 32 s. 92 (4); 1979 c. 89, 177; 1981 c. 289; 1985 a. 29 s. 3202 (23); Sup. Ct. Order, 141 Wis. 2d xiii (1987); 1993 a. 486; Sup. Ct. Order No. 95-04, 191 Wis. 2d xxi (1995); 1999 a. 150 s. 672; 2001 a. 30 s. 108; 2005 a. 387; Sup. Ct. Order No. 09-01, 2010 WI 67, filed 7-6-10, eff. 1-1-11; 2011 a. 2.