804.07.Use of depositions in court proceedings.
Ch. 804: Depositions and Discovery · Last amended 1995 · Last verified July 15, 2026
Full Text of Section 804.07
Official Notes
Judicial Council Committee’s Note, 1976: Section 804.07 (2) is taken from F.R.C.P. 32 (b). The reference in sub. (2) to “sub. (3) (d)” is changed to read “sub. (3) (c)” to correspond with subdivision (d) (3) in F.R.C.P. 32 (b). [Re Order effective Jan. 1, 1977]
Judicial Council Note, 1986: Sub. (1) (e) is amended to reflect the fact that depositions need not be filed except upon order of the court. See s. 804.05 (7) (a). [Re Order eff. 7-1-86]
Plain-English Summary
Not every deposition can be read into the record at trial, and Section 804.07 sorts out when one can. Any deposition can be used to contradict or impeach the deponent’s trial testimony. The deposition of a party, or of an officer, director, managing agent, or designated representative of a corporate or governmental party, can be used by an adverse party for any purpose. For other witnesses, the deposition can be used for any purpose only if the court finds the witness is dead, more than 30 miles from the trial or out of state, unable to attend because of age, illness, infirmity, or imprisonment, unable to be reached by subpoena, or if exceptional circumstances justify it. A medical expert’s deposition can be used for any purpose without those limits at all.
The section also addresses fairness in how much of a deposition comes in. If one party offers only part of a deposition, an adverse party can require that any other part be introduced that ought in fairness to be considered alongside it, and any party can introduce additional parts on their own. Substituting parties under Section 803.10 does not affect the right to use depositions taken before the substitution, and depositions from a dismissed case can be used again if the same claim is refiled between the same parties.
The remaining subsections are about preserving objections. Objections to the notice, to the officer’s qualifications, or to the form of written questions must be raised promptly or they are waived. Objections to a witness’s competency, or to the relevance or materiality of testimony, are not waived just because they were not made during the deposition, unless the objection is the kind that could have been fixed if raised at the time. And any defect in how the deposition was transcribed, signed, certified, or handled afterward has to be challenged by a motion to suppress made with reasonable promptness once the defect is discovered or should have been discovered.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I use a deposition just to challenge a witness’s trial testimony?
Yes. Section 804.07(1)(a) lets any party use any deposition for the purpose of contradicting or impeaching the deponent’s testimony as a witness.
When can a non-party witness’s deposition be used for any purpose, not just impeachment?
When the court finds the witness is dead, more than 30 miles from the place of trial or out of state and not returning before the trial ends, unable to attend because of age, illness, infirmity, or imprisonment, unreachable by subpoena despite the offering party’s efforts, or when exceptional circumstances make it desirable in the interest of justice.
Are depositions of medical experts treated differently from other witnesses?
Yes. Section 804.07(1)(c)2. lets a medical expert’s deposition be used by any party for any purpose, without the limitations that apply to other non-party witnesses.
What happens if I do not object to a defect in how a deposition was taken at the time?
Under Section 804.07(3)(c), errors and irregularities in the manner of taking the deposition, in the form of questions or answers, or in the oath, are waived unless a timely objection is made at the deposition, though objections to a witness’s competency or to relevance are not waived that way unless they could have been fixed if raised at the time.
Does a party’s death or substitution ruin the usefulness of a deposition already taken?
No. Section 804.07(1)(e) says substitution of parties under Section 803.10 does not affect the right to use depositions taken before the substitution.
Amendment History
History: Sup. Ct. Order, 67 Wis. 2d 585, 673 (1975); 1975 c. 218; Sup. Ct. Order, 73 Wis. 2d xxxi (1976); 1983 a. 192; Sup. Ct. Order, 130 Wis. 2d xix (1986); 1993 a. 112; 1995 a. 225.