806.05.Declaratory judgments against obscene matter.
Ch. 806: Judgment · Last amended 1977 · Last verified July 15, 2026
Full Text of Section 806.05
Plain-English Summary
Section 806.05 creates a specialized declaratory action against obscene material rather than against a person. Whenever a district attorney has reasonable cause to believe that a book, magazine, picture, sound recording, or film being sold, loaned, or distributed in the county is obscene, the district attorney may file a complaint, in the state’s name, directed against that matter by name. If the court agrees there is reasonable cause, it issues an order to show cause, published as a class 2 notice and mailed to the publisher, producer, distributors, copyright holders, and author within 72 hours, and it may make an interlocutory finding of obscenity that carries the same effect as a final judgment until one is entered.
Anyone interested in publishing, producing, selling, loaning, exhibiting, or distributing the material may appear and answer by the return date. Claiming a jury trial in that answer preserves the right to have a jury decide whether the matter is obscene; failing to claim it waives the right unless the court orders otherwise for cause. If nobody answers in time, the court may, without further notice, find the matter obscene by default on the plaintiff’s motion.
Once an answer is filed, the case is set for a speedy hearing, though a default adjudication is entered first against anyone who never appeared. At the hearing, the court receives expert testimony and evidence about the material’s literary, cultural, or educational character and about how it was produced, published, advertised, distributed, and exhibited, and it judges obscenity by the dominant effect of the material as a whole.
The resulting judgment can go either way and is appealable by anyone adversely affected, whether that is the district attorney or someone interested in the material. If the matter is found not obscene, the court can award up to one hundred dollars in costs to the people who defended it, paid from the county treasury. And the final judgment, or an earlier interlocutory adjudication, becomes admissible evidence in a later criminal obscenity prosecution on both the question of obscenity and the defendant’s knowledge that the material was obscene, subject to timing and notice requirements protecting the defendant.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who can start a case to have material declared obscene in Wisconsin?
The district attorney of the county where the material is being sold, loaned, or distributed, or is possessed with intent to sell, loan, or distribute it, may file the complaint in the state’s name.
Do the people distributing the material get a jury trial?
Yes, if they claim it. Anyone interested in the material’s publication, production, sale, loan, exhibition, or distribution may file an answer, and claiming the right to a jury trial in that answer means the issue of obscenity is tried to a jury; not claiming it waives the right unless the court orders otherwise for cause.
What happens if no one answers the district attorney’s complaint?
If no one appears and answers within the time allowed, the court may, without further notice, adjudicate the matter obscene on the plaintiff’s motion if it finds the matter is obscene.
What standard does the court use to decide if something is obscene?
At the hearing, the court receives evidence and expert testimony on the material’s literary, cultural, and educational character and its manner of production and distribution, and the dominant effect of the whole of the material determines whether it is obscene.
Can this obscenity judgment be used later in a criminal case?
Yes. The final judgment, or an interlocutory adjudication made before it, is admissible in a criminal prosecution for the related offense on the issue of obscenity and the defendant’s knowledge, but a judgment finding the matter obscene can be admitted against a defendant only if that defendant was served with notice of the judgment and the prosecuted conduct occurred more than eighteen hours after that notice or the defendant’s appearance in the obscenity case, whichever is earlier.
Amendment History
History: Sup. Ct. Order, 67 Wis. 2d 585, 721 (1975); 1975 c. 218; 1977 c. 187, 272.