Rule 56.Summary judgment
Group VII: Judgment · Last amended March 1, 2017 · Last verified July 14, 2026
Full Text of Rule 56
Amendment History
Added February 2, 2017, effective March 1, 2017.
Plain-English Summary
Summary judgment is the mechanism for ending a case, or part of one, without a trial when there is nothing left for a jury or judge to decide. Under Rule 56(a), any party can move for judgment on an entire claim or defense, or just a slice of one, and the court must grant the motion if the record shows no genuine factual dispute and the law favors the movant. Absent a court order setting a different schedule, a party can file this motion at any time.
The procedural mechanics matter as much as the standard. A party asserting that a fact is or is not disputed must point to specific record materials — depositions, documents, affidavits, admissions, and the like — or show that the other side’s cited materials fail to establish what they claim, or that the other side has no admissible evidence to back up the point. Either side can object that cited material could never be presented in admissible form. The court is not obligated to hunt through the whole record on its own; it need only consider what the parties cite, though it may look further if it chooses. Any affidavit or declaration offered to support or oppose the motion must rest on personal knowledge, state facts that would be admissible at trial, and show the person is competent to testify to them.
Rule 56 also anticipates the harder edge cases. If the party opposing summary judgment shows it cannot yet marshal the facts needed to respond — because discovery is incomplete, for instance — the court can defer ruling, deny the motion outright, or allow more time to gather evidence. If a party fails to properly support or contest a factual assertion, the court can give it another chance, treat the fact as undisputed, grant judgment on that basis, or fashion some other order. The court can even grant summary judgment to the side that did not ask for it, or on grounds nobody raised, or on its own initiative, as long as it gives notice and a fair chance to respond first. Where the court denies full relief on a motion, it can still lock in whichever material facts are not disputed for use later in the case. And a party who submits an affidavit or declaration in bad faith, or purely to stall, risks having to pay the other side’s resulting expenses and attorney’s fees, on top of possible contempt or other sanctions.
Frequently Asked Questions
What do I have to prove to win summary judgment on the ground that there is no genuine issue of material fact?
You need to show two things: the record contains no genuine dispute over any fact that matters to the outcome, and the law, applied to those undisputed facts, entitles you to win. If either piece is missing, the case has to go forward toward trial.
When can I file a motion for summary judgment (an MSJ)?
Unless the court has set a different schedule, you can file a summary judgment motion at any time during the case, on the whole claim or defense or just part of it.
What if I don't have enough evidence yet to oppose a summary judgment motion?
You can submit an affidavit or declaration explaining, with specifics, why you cannot yet present the facts you need. The court can then defer ruling, deny the motion, give you time to gather affidavits or take discovery, or issue some other appropriate order.
What happens if I don't properly respond to the other side's factual assertions?
The court can give you another chance to address the fact, treat it as undisputed for purposes of the motion, or, if the undisputed record supports it, grant summary judgment against you outright.
Can the court grant summary judgment without either side asking for it?
Yes. After giving the parties notice and a reasonable chance to respond, the court can grant judgment for the nonmoving party, grant a motion on grounds nobody raised, or raise the possibility of summary judgment on its own by identifying facts that appear undisputed.