Rule 65.Injunctions
Group VIII: Provisional and Final Remedies and Special Proceedings · Last amended March 1, 2021 · Last verified July 15, 2026
Full Text of Rule 65
Explanatory Note
Rule 65 was amended, effective July 1, 1981; July 1, 2012; March 1, 2014; March 1, 2021. Rule 65 is designed to provide a framework for injunction procedure in North Dakota. It integrates elements of the state's injunction procedure statutes, now superseded, with the federal rule on injunctions, Fed.R.Civ.P. 65, and concepts from injunction rules from other states.
Grounds for granting a permanent injunction are listed in N.D.C.C. § 32-05-04. Grounds for granting a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction are listed in N.D.C.C. § 32-06-02.
The court should promptly hear and decide a motion to dissolve or modify a temporary restraining order. If the parties stipulate, the court may convert the hearing on the motion to dissolve or modify into the preliminary injunction hearing.
If the parties stipulate, the court may advance the trial and consolidate it with the preliminary injunction hearing. The parties and the court should take care, however, to preserve the right a party may have to a jury trial on issues separate from the issue of injunctive relief.
An opposing party may combine a Rule 65(h)(4) motion for security, or additional or different security, with a Rule 65(a)(7) motion to dissolve or modify a temporary restraining order.
Subdivision (g) was amended, effective March 1, 2014, to include references to permanent injunctions.
Rule 65 was amended, effective March 1, 2021, to delete the term "affidavit" and replace it with "declaration." This amendment was made in response to N.D.C.C. ch. 31-15, which allows anyone to make an unsworn declaration that has the same effect as a sworn declaration, such as an affidavit. N.D.C.C. § 31-15-05 provides the required form for an unsworn declaration.
Plain-English Summary
A temporary restraining order is short-lived injunctive relief a court can issue on less notice than a preliminary injunction requires, meant to prevent irreparable injury until the court can decide on a preliminary injunction. The moving party must submit a proposed complaint with the TRO motion and file both, along with supporting documents, by the next court business day after submission — miss that and an issued TRO terminates at the end of that day. The moving party must also submit a declaration describing efforts to notify the opposing party or its attorney, or explaining why notice should be excused, and the court can issue the TRO only if it finds appropriate injunction grounds, a clear need for immediate relief, and either reasonable notice or a substantial reason for skipping it.
Once a court issues a TRO, the party that obtained it must schedule the preliminary injunction hearing no less than 21 and no more than 28 days out, and the TRO itself expires at the end of the 28th day unless the court shortens that for good cause, the opposing party agrees to more time, or the court extends it because a hearing couldn't be scheduled in time. At or after the hearing, the court may add up to 14 more days if needed to decide the preliminary injunction motion, and it must record its reasons for any extension. Service follows Rule 4 if the summons and complaint haven't yet been served, or Rule 5 if they have. If the opposing party got less than four days' actual notice before the TRO issued, it can move to dissolve or modify the order on four days' notice, and the burden falls on the party that obtained the TRO to justify keeping it.
A preliminary injunction requires notice of hearing, and the moving party must file and serve the summons and complaint no later than when it serves the preliminary injunction motion. Absent good cause otherwise, the moving party must serve that motion, its brief, and supporting materials at least 14 days before the hearing. The briefing schedule differs depending on whether a TRO is already in place: with a TRO, the moving party serves within seven days of the TRO date, the opposing party responds within seven days after that, and a reply needs court permission for good cause, with the TRO subject to dissolution if the moving party doesn't serve on time; without a TRO, the opposing party still gets seven days to respond and the moving party gets five days to reply. Evidence on a TRO motion is ordinarily by declaration, which may rest on information and belief as long as the declarant identifies which parts are personal knowledge; evidence on a preliminary injunction may include oral testimony, and any supporting or opposing declaration must be based on personal knowledge. If the court issues a preliminary injunction, trial on the permanent injunction must happen within 180 days of the date the TRO or preliminary injunction was first issued, absent good cause or the opposing party's consent to more time, and the court should decide within 60 days after trial.
Every injunction order must state its terms specifically and describe the restrained or required acts in reasonable detail, without just pointing back to the complaint, and it binds only the parties, their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and others acting in concert with them who get actual notice. Before a TRO or preliminary injunction takes effect for enforcement, the moving party must generally post security sufficient to cover the enjoined party's costs and damages if the order turns out to be wrongly granted — the United States, North Dakota, and their agencies and officers are exempt, and the security amount doesn't cap what a wrongfully enjoined party can later recover. Violating an injunction is punishable as contempt. Rule 65(j) leaves in place the separate procedures that already govern injunctive relief in employer-employee disputes, in divorce, support, parental-rights, or domestic-violence cases, and in disorderly-conduct actions.
Frequently Asked Questions
What's the difference between a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction in North Dakota?
A TRO is short-lived relief a court can grant on less notice, meant to prevent irreparable injury until the court decides whether to issue a preliminary injunction. A preliminary injunction, which requires more notice and a scheduled hearing, prevents irreparable injury until trial on a permanent injunction.
What does North Dakota require before a court will issue a TRO?
Rule 65(a)(3) requires the court to find appropriate injunction grounds, a clear need for immediate relief, and either that the moving party gave or made reasonable efforts to give notice to the opposing party, or that a substantial reason exists for not giving notice.
How long does a North Dakota TRO last, and when is the preliminary injunction hearing held?
A TRO expires at the end of the 28th day after issuance unless shortened or extended under Rule 65(a)(5), and the party that obtained it must generally get a preliminary injunction hearing scheduled no less than 21 and no more than 28 days from the TRO date.
Can the opposing party challenge a TRO before the preliminary injunction hearing happens?
Yes. If the opposing party got less than four days' actual notice before the TRO issued, Rule 65(a)(7) lets it move to dissolve or modify the order on four days' notice, and the party that obtained the TRO bears the burden of justifying its continuation.
Do I have to post a bond to get a TRO or preliminary injunction in North Dakota?
Generally yes. Rule 65(h) requires the moving party to post security before the order becomes effective for enforcement, unless the court finds good cause not to require it or the case involves the United States, North Dakota, or one of their agencies or officers acting officially.