Rule 1-030.1.Audiotaped and videotaped depositions
Last amended May 1, 2006 · Last verified June 26, 2026
Full Text of Rule 1-030.1
Rule History
[Approved, effective February 16, 2004; as amended by Supreme Court Order No. 06-8300-007, effective May 1, 2006.]
Committee Commentary
Comment A. In general.
The 2006 amendment added "the officer conducting the deposition may only go off the record with the agreement of the parties, which shall not be unreasonably withheld" to Subparagraph (4) of Paragraph C. A similar provision was added to Paragraph C of Rule 1-030 NMRA. See Rule 1-028 NMRA for officers before whom a deposition may be taken.
In 1999, Rule 1-030 NMRA was amended to permit parties to audiotape or videotape depositions without prior permission of the court, unless the court ordered otherwise on motion of a party opposed to recordation by audio or video means.
Experience with the 1999 rule brought problems to light. First, there were no standards for assuring that audio or visual machine operators would accurately record the deposition. Second, other rules dealing with deposition procedures, such as the provision allowing the deponent to review and make corrections of the official record of the deposition, proved cumbersome when applied to audiotaped or videotaped depositions.
In conjunction with changes made in other rules, Rule 1-030.1 NMRA improves the administration of the use of video and audiotaped depositions in court proceedings. Rule 1-030.1(C) establishes standard procedures for conducting audiotaped and videotaped depositions unless the parties agree otherwise or the court orders otherwise. Rule 1-030.1(D) specifies the procedure for providing copies and for securing approval of depositions when an audiotaped or videotaped deposition is taken. Finally, Rule 1-032(C) NMRA provides for the method of presentation of audiotaped or videotaped depositions in court proceedings.
Comment B. Audiotaped and videotaped depositions.
A party need not get prior court approval in order to audiotape or videotape a deposition. The party noticing a deposition is required to designate in the notice the method by which the deposition is to be taken. Rule 1-030(B)(2) NMRA.
Comment C. Simultaneous verbatim reporting of audiotaped or videotaped depositions.
There are no existing provisions for licensing and certifying persons who operate audiotape and videotape equipment to record depositions. (Only certified court monitors of "in-court" proceedings are currently regulated and certified. See Rule 22-201 NMRA). Until regulations assuring competence of audio and video operators and the accuracy of the audio or video record exists, accuracy can best be assured by requiring compliance with the requirements set forth in Rules 1-030(C) and 1-030.1(C) NMRA and supplemental court orders, if any.
Comment D. Cost of recording depositions.
The party taking the deposition will be responsible for payment of the cost of the deposition in the format specified in the notice. Rule 1-030(B)(2) NMRA. If another party designates another method to record the testimony, the additional record will be made at that party's expense unless otherwise ordered by the court. See Rule 1-030(B)(3) NMRA.
Comment E. Procedures and requirements for recording audio or video depositions.
Because audio and video depositions can take place without prior court approval, there is a need to set general standards for conducting such depositions. Rule 1-030.1(C) does this. The court may, on motion, modify these standards or add to them.
Comment F. Approval of audiotaped or videotaped depositions.
While the original audiotapes or videotapes cannot be physically altered, Rule 1-030.1(C)(8) NMRA, the deponent may review the recording and, in a separate writing, note substantive or formal changes in the recorded testimony and the reasons therefor. Rule 1-030.1(D) NMRA. If a stenographic recording was made by a certified court reporter, a statement reciting changes to the stenographic recording should be made pursuant to Rule 1-030(E) NMRA.
Plain-English Summary
This rule supplies the procedures for recording a deposition by audiotape or videotape. On request, the party who noticed the recording must let others review a copy and furnish a copy at reasonable cost. Unless the court orders or the parties stipulate otherwise, the recording follows detailed standards: everyone is identified at the start, only the deponent and demonstratives are filmed, the setting is neutral, going off the record requires agreement and an announced time, tapes are logged with counter references, and the original may not be edited—though copies may be redacted for court use.
If there is no stenographic transcript, the party holding the tape provides a copy to the deponent, who has thirty days to sign a statement of any changes; failing that, no later changes may be made. A party who wants to use an audiotaped or videotaped deposition under Rule 1-032 must bring the playback equipment and an operator. As the committee commentary explains, the rule was created to set accuracy standards after parties could record without prior court approval.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I need court approval to videotape a deposition?
No. A party may audiotape or videotape a deposition without prior court approval, but must designate the recording method in the notice and follow the rule’s recording standards.
Can the original recording be edited?
No. The original audio or video recording may not be edited or altered, though copies may be redacted as appropriate for use in court.