Rule 63.Disability or disqualification of a judge
Part VII: Judgment · Last amended February 13, 2026 · Last verified July 13, 2026
Full Text of Rule 63
Amendment History
Amended effective November 1, 1999; November 1, 2006; May 1, 2014; May 1, 2016; April 1, 2018; May 8, 2018; February 13, 2026.
Plain-English Summary
Two different situations sit inside this rule. The first is administrative: if the judge assigned to a case can't perform judicial duties — because of illness, reassignment, or anything else — any other judge of that district, or a judge assigned under the Judicial Council's rules, can pick up the case. The new judge may rehear evidence already taken, or any part of it, rather than starting from scratch.
The second situation is disqualification for cause. A party or attorney who believes a judge is biased, prejudiced, or conflicted can file a motion to disqualify, backed by a certificate of good faith and an affidavit or unsworn declaration laying out the specific facts. The motion has to be filed within 21 days of the latest of three triggers: the case or hearing being assigned to the judge, the party or attorney's appearance, or the date the party knew or should have known the grounds existed. If that 21-day window would run past a hearing that's coming up sooner, the motion has to go in as soon as practicable instead. A party gets one shot at this in a case, unless a later motion rests on grounds the party had no way to know about and couldn't have discovered earlier. Because signing the motion or supporting affidavit counts as a Rule 11 certification, filing one without a real basis exposes the signer to sanctions.
The judge who is the target of the motion doesn't get to rule on it. That judge must either grant it outright or certify the motion and affidavit to a reviewing judge — the presiding judge, another judge of the district, or a judge from a court of like jurisdiction — without holding a hearing first, and must take no further action in the case until the motion is resolved. The reviewing judge checks whether the motion was timely, filed in good faith, and legally sufficient before reassigning the case. A separate, parallel process applies when the judge being challenged sits on a district court panel: the presiding officer of the Judicial Council serves as the reviewing judge there.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long do I have to file a motion to disqualify a judge in Utah?
Within 21 days of the latest of: the assignment of the action or hearing to the judge, your appearance (or your attorney's), or the date you knew or should have known the grounds for disqualification existed. If that deadline would fall fewer than 21 days before a scheduled hearing, file the motion as soon as practicable instead.
Can I file more than one motion to disqualify against the same judge?
No, not in the same action — unless a later motion is based on grounds you didn't know about and couldn't have known about when you filed the first one.
Does the judge I'm trying to disqualify get to decide my motion?
No. That judge must either grant the motion or certify it, along with the supporting affidavit or declaration, to a reviewing judge — without a hearing or a response from the other side — and must take no further action in the case until it's decided.
What has to support a motion to disqualify a judge?
A certificate that the motion is filed in good faith, an affidavit or unsworn declaration stating facts sufficient to show bias, prejudice, or a conflict of interest, and a request to submit the motion for decision.