RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 63A.Change of judge as a matter of right

Part VII: Judgment · Last amended February 13, 2026 · Last verified July 13, 2026

In one sentenceRule 63A gives each side of a civil case one no-cause change of judge, either by unilateral notice in larger counties or by unanimous agreement of every party, without disturbing the for-cause disqualification process in Rule 63.

Full Text of Rule 63A

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c)

(a) Change of judge by one side of an action.
(1) Right to change a judge by one side of an action.
(A) In a civil action pending in a court in a county with seven or more district court judges, each side is entitled to one change of judge as a matter of right under this paragraph (a).
(B) When a district court panel is convened, each side is entitled to one change of a judge on the district court panel as a matter of right under this paragraph (a).
(C) Even if two or more parties on one side of a civil action have adverse or hostile interests, the action, whether single or consolidated, must be treated as only having two sides for purposes of a changing judge under this paragraph (a).
(D) A side is not entitled to more than one change of judge under this paragraph (a).
(E) Regardless of when a party joins a civil action, a party is not entitled to a change of judge as a matter of right under this paragraph (a) if the notice of a change of judge is untimely under paragraph (a)(2).
(2) Notice of a change of judge.
(A) A party seeking a change of judge under this paragraph (a) must file a notice of a change of judge with the clerk of the court.
(B) If the notice of a change of judge is timely under this paragraph (a)(2), the notice must be granted.
(C) In filing a notice of a change of judge under this paragraph (a), a party is not required to state any reason for seeking a change of judge, but the party must attest in good faith that the notice is not being filed:
(i) for the purpose to delay any action or proceeding; or
(ii) to change the judge on the grounds of race, gender, or religious affiliation.
(D) The notice must be filed:
(i) on the side of a plaintiff or petitioner, within seven days after the day on which a judge is first assigned to the action or proceeding; or
(ii) on the side of a defendant or respondent, within seven days after the day on which the defendant or respondent is served the complaint or petition, or at the time of the first filing by the defendant or respondent with the court, whichever occurs first.
(E) For a district court panel, the notice must be filed within seven days after the day on which the parties receive notice of the judges assigned to the district court panel.
(F) Failure to file a timely notice of a change of judge under this rule precludes a change of judge under this paragraph (a).
(3) Assignment of action.
(A) Upon the filing of a notice under this paragraph (a), the judge assigned to the action must take no further action in the case.
(B) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(3)(D), the action must be promptly reassigned to another judge within the county.
(C) If the action is unable to be reassigned to another judge within the county under paragraph (a)(3)(B), the action may be transferred to a court in another county in accordance with Rule 42.
(D) If a notice of a change of judge is filed or a district court panel:
(i) the action is not reassigned to a new district court panel; and
(ii) a new judge must be promptly assigned in accordance with the random selection process described in the Utah Code of Judicial Administration for a district court panel.
(4) Exceptions. A party, or a side, is not entitled to change a judge as a matter of right under this paragraph (a):
(A) in any proceeding regarding a petition for post-conviction relief under Rule 65C;
(B) on a petition to modify child custody, child support, or alimony, unless the judge assigned to the action is not the same judge assigned to any of the previous actions between the parties;
(C) in an action before the juvenile court or the Business and Chancery Court;
(D) in an action in which the judge is sitting as a water or tax judge;
(E) in an action on remand from an appellate court; or
(F) if an action is unable to be transferred under paragraph (a)(3)(C) to another county in accordance with Rule 42.
(b) Right to change a judge by agreement of the parties.
(1) Notice of a change of judge.
(A) Except in actions with only one party, all parties joined in the action may, by unanimous agreement and without cause, change the judge assigned to the action by filing a notice of change of judge.
(B) For an action before a district court panel, all parties joined in the action may, by unanimous agreement and without cause, change a judge assigned to the panel by filing a notice of change of judge.
(C) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(1)(D), the parties must file a copy of the notice with the assigned judge and send a copy of the notice to the presiding judge.
(D) If the action is before a district court panel, the parties must file a copy of the notice with the district court panel and send a copy of the notice to the presiding officer of the Judicial Council.
(E) The notice must be signed by all parties and must state: (1) the name of the assigned judge;
(2) the date on which the action was commenced; (3) that all parties joined in the action have agreed to the change; (4) that no other persons are expected to be named as parties; and (5) that a good faith effort has been made to serve all parties named in the pleadings.
(F) The notice may not specify any reason for the change of judge.
(G) Under no circumstances is more than one change of judge allowed under this paragraph (b) in an action. (2) Time for filing a notice.
(A) Unless extended by the court upon a showing of good cause, the notice must be filed within 90 days after
(i) commencement of the action or prior to the notice of trial setting, whichever occurs first; or
(ii) if the action is before a district court panel, the parties receive notice of the judges assigned to the district court panel.
(B) Failure to file a timely notice precludes any change of judge under this paragraph (b).
(3) Assignment of action.
(A) Upon the filing of a notice of change, the assigned judge must take no further action in the case.
(B) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(3)(D), the presiding judge must promptly determine whether the notice is proper and, if so, must reassign the action.
(C) If the presiding judge is also the assigned judge, the clerk must promptly send the notice to the associate presiding judge, to another judge of the district, or to any judge of a court of like jurisdiction, who must determine whether the notice is proper and, if so, must reassign the action.
(D) If a notice is filed for a change of judge on a district court panel:
(i) the presiding officer of the Judicial Council must promptly determine whether the notice is proper; and
(ii) if the notice is proper, a new judge must be promptly assigned in accordance with the random selection process described in the Utah Code of Judicial Administration for a district court panel.
(4) Nondisclosure to court. A party may not communicate to the court, or cause another to communicate to the court, the fact of any party's seeking consent to a notice of change.
(c) Rule 63 unaffected. Nothing in this rule precludes the right of any party to seek disqualification of a judge under Rule 63.
End

Amendment History

Added effective April 15, 1992; amended effective November 1, 1996; November 1, 2009; January 1, 2025; February 13, 2026.

Plain-English Summary

This rule creates two ways to swap judges without proving bias or a conflict, separate from the for-cause disqualification procedure in Rule 63, which remains available regardless of anything in this rule.

The first path belongs to a single side of the case, but only in a court located in a county with seven or more district court judges, or when a district court panel has been convened. Each side — plaintiff or defendant, treated as a single side even if it has multiple parties with adverse interests — gets one change of judge as a matter of right. It's triggered by filing a notice, not a motion, with the clerk: no reason has to be given, but the filer must attest in good faith that the notice isn't meant to delay the case or to target the judge's race, gender, or religious affiliation. Plaintiffs and petitioners must file within seven days of the judge's first assignment; defendants and respondents within seven days of being served or their first filing with the court, whichever comes first. Miss the deadline and the right is gone.

The second path is available to everyone jointly: all parties can agree, without stating any cause, to change the assigned judge by filing a unanimous, signed notice within 90 days of commencing the action or before the notice of trial setting, whichever comes first (extendable by the court for good cause). Only one change is allowed under this path per action, and parties can't tell the court that anyone is even seeking the other side's consent to it.

The one-side path doesn't apply everywhere. It's unavailable in post-conviction relief proceedings under Rule 65C, in most petitions to modify child custody, support, or alimony (unless a different judge is now assigned than handled the parties' earlier cases), in juvenile court or the Business and Chancery Court, when the judge is sitting as a water or tax judge, on remand from an appellate court, or when the action can't be transferred to another county under Rule 42.

Frequently Asked Questions

How is changing a judge under Rule 63A different from disqualifying one under Rule 63?

Rule 63A doesn't require any showing of bias or a conflict — a timely notice is enough, and no reason has to be stated. Rule 63 disqualification requires an affidavit or declaration showing actual grounds like bias, prejudice, or a conflict of interest, and remains available under this rule at any time.

How many days do I have to file a notice to change a judge as a matter of right?

For the one-side change: seven days from the triggering event (first assignment for plaintiffs/petitioners; service of the complaint or first filing for defendants/respondents, whichever is first). For the unanimous-agreement change: 90 days from commencement of the action or before the notice of trial setting, whichever comes first, unless the court extends that period for good cause.

Can I use the one-side, no-cause change of judge in any county?

No. That path is available only in a court in a county with seven or more district court judges, or when a district court panel has been convened.

Are there cases where a no-cause change of judge isn't available?

Yes. The one-side change doesn't apply to post-conviction relief petitions under Rule 65C, most petitions to modify custody, support, or alimony, juvenile court or Business and Chancery Court cases, water or tax judge assignments, remands from an appellate court, or situations where the action can't be transferred to another county under Rule 42.

Can both the plaintiff and the defendant each get a no-cause change of judge in the same case?

Yes. Each side is entitled to one change as a matter of right under the one-side path, and a side with multiple parties who have adverse interests is still treated as a single side for this purpose.

Source & verification. Rule text, Advisory Committee Notes, and amendment history are reproduced verbatim from the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure, adopted by the Utah Supreme Court. Last verified July 13, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: change of judge as a matter of right utahperemptory change of judge utahremoving a judge without cause utahnotice to change judge deadline utahunanimous agreement to change judgeseven day notice change judge