§ 8.01-226.7.Owner and agent compliance with residential lead-based paint notification; maintenance immunity.
Chapter 3. Actions · Article 21. Miscellaneous Provisions · Last amended 2007 · Last verified July 16, 2026
Full Text of § 8.01-226.7
Plain-English Summary
Federal law requires sellers and landlords of pre-1978 housing to disclose known lead-based paint hazards before a sale closes or a lease begins. This section builds a Virginia liability shield on top of that federal disclosure framework, but assigns different obligations to different actors. Subsection A defines the key terms — agent, lead-based paint, lead-based paint hazard, lead-based paint maintenance, and residential dwelling — anchoring “lead-based paint maintenance” to Virginia’s International Property Maintenance Code standard.
Subsection B protects an agent — generally, a licensed real estate professional retained by a seller or lessor — who has complied with the federal Act’s requirements: providing the EPA-approved lead hazard pamphlet, disclosing known lead hazards and related information, obtaining the purchaser’s or tenant’s signed acknowledgment, meeting public-housing-authority requirements where applicable, and keeping disclosure obligations current throughout a tenancy as new information comes in. An agent who also carries maintenance responsibility for the property, though, only gets this immunity if the property was maintained consistent with subsection C’s maintenance standard.
Subsection C protects the owner, or an agent responsible for lead-based paint maintenance, on similar disclosure terms, but adds the substantive requirement that the painted surfaces were maintained in compliance with the International Property Maintenance Code. Subsection D gives an owner or agent invoking this immunity a procedural tool: they can raise it in a responsive pleading and ask for a hearing, after discovery limited to the immunity issue, to resolve entitlement to immunity before the rest of the case proceeds.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does complying with federal lead-paint disclosure rules protect a landlord from a lead-poisoning lawsuit in Virginia?
It can, if the landlord, or an agent with maintenance responsibility, also kept the painted surfaces maintained consistent with the International Property Maintenance Code, and met the disclosure steps in subsection C — the EPA pamphlet, hazard disclosure, signed acknowledgment, and ongoing updates.
What is the difference between the protection for an “agent” and for an “owner”?
An agent without maintenance responsibility only needs to meet the disclosure requirements in subsection B. An agent who does have maintenance responsibility, and an owner, need to meet the disclosure requirements and show the property was maintained under the applicable property-maintenance code standard in subsection C.
What has to be given to a tenant or buyer before immunity applies?
An EPA-approved lead hazard information pamphlet, disclosure of known lead-based paint or hazards and related information, and a signed written acknowledgment of that disclosure and receipt of the literature, all before the lease or purchase contract is signed.
Does the disclosure obligation end once the lease is signed?
No. Both subsections B and C require continuing disclosure of any new information about lead-based paint or hazards that comes to light during the tenancy, with a written summary provided to the tenant.
How does an owner or agent invoke this immunity in a lawsuit?
Subsection D lets them assert it in their responsive pleading and request a hearing, after discovery limited to the immunity question, so the court can decide entitlement to immunity before the case moves forward on the merits.
Amendment History
2000, c. 1071; 2006, c. 855; 2007, c. 255.